For government entities and public facilities
What we hear from you
Three problems that recur — and how we prevent them.
“The report is needed within two days”
The platform log issues the visit and maintenance report immediately, with no manual collation.
“Who guarantees the document is genuine?”
Every document carries a verification code the entity can check for itself.
“The requirements have changed”
We track requirement updates and tell you what needs amending before the visit.
What we do for you
Six things that make the file complete.
A licensed establishment
Execution through a provider accredited on the “Amn” platform of Public Security.
Execution to the requirements
A design that meets the regulatory requirements item by item, not as a general description.
Auditable documents
A complete project file: design, execution, testing, handover and maintenance.
A documented visit log
Every visit with photographs and a timestamp, extractable at any time.
Electronic verification of documents
A code on each document lets the entity confirm its authenticity directly.
Periodic reports to management
The state of each site and its readiness, without anyone having to ask.
Not your category?
Every category has its own page.
We serve individuals, facilities, companies and government entities — each with different requirements and a different language.
Homes and villas, Shops and facilities, Companies and factories, Contractors and engineering offices
We start by understanding your situation — not by selling a device.
Tell us about your site and what you need, and you get a clear initial picture before any commitment.
What is submitted in the prequalification and tender file
An entity does not buy on a price quotation; it buys on a file that is audited. This is the package submitted with every bid:
- A scope of work matching the conditions booklet, item against item rather than reworded.
- A bill of quantities and performance specifications — comparable without bias to a supplier.
- The establishment’s regulatory documents as the entity requires them.
- An execution plan and delivery phases, and each party’s responsibility where work overlaps with other contractors.
- Auditable handover outputs — not “installed” but what was installed, where, and with which configuration.
What distinguishes execution that can be audited
The difference between a system that is handed over and one that is audited is the written trace. Delivered with the project:
- An asset register with every device, its serial number, its position and its installation date.
- As-built drawings showing routes and positions as executed, not as designed.
- A permission matrix — who views, who exports, and who changes settings.
- A log of visits and works carried out after handover, readable at any time.
- A retention period proven by measurement, not estimated, with the capacity calculation written down.
Operational continuity after handover
What brings facility systems down is usually not a fault in the installation but that whoever installed it left, and the system remained without an administrative owner. So accounts are handed over in the entity’s name rather than a person’s, and the operating procedures are documented so a new employee can run it without depending on anyone.
